Le terme arthrite recouvre plusieurs maladies capables de provoquer douleur, gonflement et raideur articulaire. Arthrose, goutte, polyarthrite inflammatoire et arthrite infectieuse n’ont ni la même origine ni le même traitement, ce qui rend le diagnostic particulièrement important. Cet article se concentre sur un aspect précis : colchicine en prévention des crises de goutte : dans quel contexte est-elle utilisée ?. L’objectif est d’expliquer les mécanismes, les situations cliniques et les précautions utiles sans remplacer un diagnostic ni une prescription.

Comprendre l’inflammation articulaire

Une articulation douloureuse peut être le siège d’une inflammation de la membrane synoviale, d’une dégradation du cartilage, d’un dépôt de cristaux ou plus rarement d’une infection. Ces mécanismes produisent des symptômes parfois proches mais nécessitent des traitements différents.

Les anti-inflammatoires diminuent certains médiateurs de la douleur et de l’inflammation, mais ils ne modifient pas nécessairement la cause de la maladie. Dans les rhumatismes inflammatoires, des traitements de fond peuvent être nécessaires pour limiter les lésions articulaires à long terme.

Le point essentiel sur ce sujet

La colchicine possède une marge thérapeutique étroite. Les troubles digestifs, notamment une diarrhée importante, peuvent être un signe de toxicité et ne doivent pas conduire à multiplier les prises.

Une articulation rouge, chaude, très douloureuse avec fièvre nécessite une évaluation rapide afin d’exclure notamment une arthrite infectieuse. Dans ce contexte, masquer simplement la douleur peut retarder une prise en charge urgente. Pour compléter ce point, on peut consulter Médicaments.

Ce qui peut modifier la prise en charge

Les AINS peuvent réduire la douleur et l’inflammation mais exposent à des risques digestifs, rénaux et cardiovasculaires. Le choix dépend des antécédents, des autres médicaments et de la durée prévue du traitement.

L’âge, les antécédents, la grossesse, la fonction rénale ou hépatique et les autres traitements peuvent modifier le rapport bénéfice-risque. Deux patients présentant un symptôme proche ne nécessitent donc pas nécessairement la même stratégie.

Pourquoi l’automédication peut poser problème

Un médicament peut atténuer un symptôme tout en retardant l’identification de sa cause. Il peut aussi interagir avec un autre traitement ou être contre-indiqué dans une situation qui n’est pas évidente sans interrogatoire médical.

Quels éléments discuter avec un professionnel de santé ?

Il est utile d’apporter une liste des traitements, des compléments et des antécédents médicaux, ainsi que la chronologie précise des symptômes. Cette information permet de distinguer un effet indésirable, une interaction, une évolution de la maladie ou un problème indépendant.

La dose, la durée et les objectifs doivent être compris avant de commencer un traitement. Une posologie trouvée sur Internet ne tient pas compte de la fonction rénale ou hépatique, de l’âge, des maladies associées ni des médicaments déjà utilisés.

Pourquoi les informations en ligne doivent être vérifiées

Un nom commercial peut varier selon le pays et plusieurs dosages ou formulations peuvent exister. Une page fiable doit permettre d’identifier clairement la substance active et ne pas présenter un dosage particulier comme universel. Une ressource liée à ce sujet est disponible via arthrite.

Les témoignages individuels ne permettent pas de prévoir l’efficacité ou la tolérance chez une autre personne. Pour une décision médicale, la notice officielle, les recommandations professionnelles et l’évaluation clinique restent plus pertinentes qu’un avis isolé.

Surveillance et signes d’alerte

La surveillance dépend du médicament et du terrain : pression artérielle, fréquence cardiaque, fonction rénale ou hépatique, électrolytes et évolution des symptômes peuvent être concernés. Les contrôles ne sont pas identiques pour tous les patients.

Une difficulté respiratoire, un gonflement du visage, un malaise sévère, une douleur thoracique, un trouble neurologique aigu ou une réaction cutanée étendue nécessitent une prise en charge rapide. En cas de doute sur la gravité d’un effet indésirable, un professionnel de santé doit être contacté.

Traitement ponctuel et traitement au long cours

Un médicament utilisé pendant quelques jours ne se gère pas comme un traitement chronique. Pour une prise prolongée, il faut périodiquement vérifier l’efficacité, la tolérance, l’adhésion au traitement et l’apparition de nouveaux facteurs de risque.

À l’inverse, prolonger spontanément un traitement prévu pour une courte durée peut augmenter les risques sans améliorer le résultat. La durée fait donc partie intégrante de la prescription, au même titre que la dose.

Quels éléments discuter avec un professionnel de santé ?

Il est utile d’apporter une liste des traitements, des compléments et des antécédents médicaux, ainsi que la chronologie précise des symptômes. Cette information permet de distinguer un effet indésirable, une interaction, une évolution de la maladie ou un problème indépendant. Pour approfondir certaines informations, voir également Colchicine en ligne.

La dose, la durée et les objectifs doivent être compris avant de commencer un traitement. Une posologie trouvée sur Internet ne tient pas compte de la fonction rénale ou hépatique, de l’âge, des maladies associées ni des médicaments déjà utilisés.

Questions fréquentes

Peut-on choisir un traitement uniquement à partir du nom du médicament ?

Non. Il faut vérifier la substance active, le dosage, la forme pharmaceutique, l’indication et les contre-indications. Un même nom peut exister sous plusieurs présentations.

Un effet indésirable signifie-t-il qu’il faut arrêter immédiatement ?

Cela dépend de sa nature et de sa gravité. Un effet sévère ou brutal nécessite un avis urgent. Pour un traitement chronique, l’arrêt non supervisé peut lui-même présenter un risque ; il faut donc demander conseil lorsque la situation n’est pas urgente.

Pourquoi signaler tous les autres médicaments ?

Parce que les interactions peuvent modifier l’efficacité, la pression artérielle, le rythme cardiaque, la fonction rénale, le risque de saignement ou les concentrations du médicament. Les produits sans ordonnance et certains compléments doivent également être mentionnés.

When you’re spinning the reels or placing a bet at an online casino Australia live chat isn’t just a nice-to-have – it’s a critical tool that can make or break your gaming session. Whether you’re in Sydney, Melbourne, or Brisbane, having instant access to help means you can resolve deposit issues, clarify bonus terms, or troubleshoot technical glitches without leaving your game. For Australian players, where the online gambling landscape is both competitive and tightly regulated, live chat has become the gold standard for customer service. It offers real-time solutions that email or phone support simply can’t match, especially when you’re chasing a jackpot at 2 AM.

The convenience factor is hard to overstate. Unlike traditional support channels that might keep you waiting for hours, live chat connects you with a trained representative within seconds. This immediacy is particularly valuable for players who value their time and want to keep the action flowing. In a market where trust and transparency are paramount, a responsive live chat system signals that a casino values its players and is ready to address concerns head-on.

The Role of Live Chat in Building Player Trust

Trust is the currency of any online casino Australia live chat environment. When you’re entrusting your money and personal details to a digital platform, knowing that help is a click away provides peace of mind. Live chat allows you to verify bonus conditions, check withdrawal timelines, or confirm that a game is fair – all in real time. This direct line of communication reduces uncertainty and helps you make informed decisions without second-guessing.

For Australian players, who often face unique challenges like fluctuating exchange rates or specific banking options, live chat becomes a lifeline. A quick exchange can clarify whether your preferred payment method – be it POLi, PayID, or cryptocurrency – is accepted and what the processing times look like. The ability to get accurate answers instantly builds confidence in the casino’s reliability, encouraging you to play longer and explore more games.

Beyond payment queries, live chat can also guide you toward reputable platforms that support local community initiatives, such as those listed by Badminton Australia. This ensures your gaming experience aligns with trusted organisations that understand regional sporting culture. A quick message might even reveal exclusive bonuses tied to Australian events.

Key Features to Look for in Live Chat Support

Not all live chat systems are created equal. When evaluating an online casino Australia live chat offering, pay attention to response times. Ideally, you should be connected to a human agent within 30 seconds, not a bot that cycles through generic responses. Look for casinos that provide 24/7 support, as the best gaming sessions often happen outside business hours. A robust knowledge base integrated into the chat window is another plus – it lets you find quick answers while waiting for an agent.

Another critical feature is the ability to share screenshots or documents during the chat. This is particularly useful when resolving verification issues or disputing a transaction. Casinos that offer proactive chat invitations – where an agent reaches out if you’ve been idle or stuck on a page – show they’re attentive to your experience. These small touches differentiate a mediocre platform from one that truly cares about its players.

Comparing Live Chat Quality Across Platforms

To help you gauge what to expect, here’s a straightforward comparison of live chat performance based on common industry standards:

The difference between average and premium can significantly impact your gaming experience. A casino that invests in premium live chat is more likely to resolve complex issues quickly, reducing frustration and keeping you engaged.

How Live Chat Enhances Problem Solving

Imagine you’ve won a substantial amount but can’t access your account due to a forgotten password. In a traditional support model, you’d send an email and wait hours. With online casino Australia live chat, you can verify your identity through a secure link and reset your password in minutes. This speed is invaluable when time-sensitive promotions are on the line or when you want to cash out before a bonus expires.

Live chat also excels at handling disputes. If a game doesn’t pay out as expected, an agent can review your session logs instantly. This transparency helps avoid misunderstandings and shows that the casino is accountable. For Australian players who value fairness, this level of support reinforces the integrity of the platform.

Practical Recommendations for Using Live Chat

To get the most out of your live chat experience, follow these straightforward guidelines:

• Have your account details ready before starting a chat to speed up verification
• Be specific about your issue – mention game names, transaction IDs, or bonus codes
• Ask for a transcript of the conversation for your records
• Use polite language; agents are more likely to go the extra mile for courteous players logim joefortune casino
• If the first agent can’t help, ask to be escalated to a supervisor
• Test the live chat during off-peak hours to see if response times hold up
• Check if the casino offers a callback option if you prefer a phone conversation

These steps can turn a frustrating situation into a smooth resolution, ensuring you spend less time troubleshooting and more time enjoying the games.

The Australian Player’s Perspective on Live Chat

For players in cities like Perth or Adelaide, where time zone differences can complicate support hours, 24/7 live chat is a game-changer. It means you can play late into the night without worrying about being stranded if an issue arises. Australian customs also play a role – we value direct, no-nonsense communication. Live chat aligns perfectly with this preference, offering a straightforward way to get answers without small talk or bureaucratic delays.

The local market has also embraced live chat for responsible gambling tools. Many Australian-focused casinos now use chat to offer deposit limits or self-exclusion options in real time. This proactive approach helps players stay in control, a key consideration in a regulated environment. When you see a casino prioritising your wellbeing through its support channels, it’s a strong indicator of a trustworthy operator.

Why Responsive Support Matters for Your Bankroll

Every minute you spend waiting for support is a minute you could be playing – or worse, a minute where a technical glitch could cost you money. A well-run online casino Australia live chat system minimises these risks. For example, if a deposit fails to credit, a quick chat can verify the transaction and add funds to your account immediately. This efficiency protects your bankroll and ensures you don’t miss out on time-sensitive bets or tournaments.

A fast, reliable live chat means you can resolve issues in seconds and get back to the action. For a platform that truly prioritises player experience, explore the live chat solutions at qwwf.com.au. That peace of mind keeps your gaming uninterrupted and your funds secure.

Moreover, live chat can help you optimise your play. Agents can explain wagering requirements, recommend games with high RTP, or clarify how loyalty points work. This insider knowledge, delivered in real time, gives you an edge that static FAQs can’t provide. For serious players, this access to expert advice is a significant advantage.

Your Next Move: Choose a Casino That Prioritises Support

Now that you understand the value of live chat, it’s time to put that knowledge into action. When you’re ready to join a platform, look for one that not only offers a great game selection but also backs it with exceptional customer service. A casino that invests in fast, knowledgeable, and accessible live chat is a casino that respects your time and your money.

Don’t settle for less than instant support. Sign up today at a trusted online casino Australia live chat provider and experience the difference for yourself. Whether you’re a seasoned player or new to the scene, having a reliable support team in your corner makes every spin more enjoyable. Click here to find a top-rated casino with 24/7 live chat and start playing with confidence.

When you’re spinning the reels on your favourite pokies or trying your luck at blackjack, the last thing you want to worry about is whether your money is safe. Australian players have never had more choice when it comes to online casinos, but with that choice comes the need to separate the trustworthy operators from the rest. A genuine aussie online casino offering secure payments puts your financial protection first, using bank‑grade encryption, trusted deposit methods, and fast, transparent withdrawals. Whether you’re in Sydney, Melbourne, or Brisbane, knowing that your cash is handled with the same care as a brick‑and‑mortar venue is non‑negotiable.

The local market has matured rapidly. Aussie players now expect instant deposits via PayID, low‑fee transactions through POLi, and the peace of mind that comes from sites licensed by reputable authorities. This article breaks down exactly what makes a casino secure, which payment methods are safest for Australian punters, and how to spot a platform that genuinely values your privacy.

Why payment security matters more than ever for Australian players

Online gambling in Australia operates under strict regulations, and the best operators go above and beyond to protect their customers. Payment security isn’t just about encryption – it’s about knowing that your deposit reaches the gaming account without delays, that your withdrawal request is processed on time, and that your personal data never leaks. With the rise of cyber threats, an aussie online casino offering secure payments must adopt multi‑layer protection, including SSL certificates, two‑factor authentication, and regular audits by independent bodies.

For players in Perth or Adelaide, the ability to deposit using local bank transfers or digital wallets that comply with Australian financial laws is a major plus. The recent introduction of the National Consumer Credit Protection Act amendments has also pushed operators to be more transparent about their banking partners. In short, secure payments mean you can focus on the game rather than worrying about your bank balance.

The most trusted payment methods for Australian casino players

Aussies have a strong preference for payment methods that are fast, familiar, and free of hidden fees. The table below compares the most popular options used by local players.

How to verify a casino’s payment security credentials

Not every site that claims to be secure actually delivers. Look for clear evidence of licencing from recognised jurisdictions – the UK Gambling Commission, Malta Gaming Authority, or the Alderney Gambling Control Commission are strong indicators. A reputable aussie online casino offering secure payments will also display its SSL certificate, often shown as a padlock icon in the browser bar. Additionally, check whether the casino uses segregated player accounts, meaning your funds are held separately from the operator’s operating cash.

Another tell‑tale sign is the availability of responsible gambling tools linked to your payment activity. If you can set deposit limits directly from your banking dashboard, the casino is taking security seriously. Third‑party audits from eCOGRA or iTech Labs also confirm that games are fair and payments are processed correctly.

Common pitfalls to avoid when choosing a casino

The Australian online casino landscape is crowded with flashy promotions and tempting bonuses, but not all are backed by solid payment infrastructure. Avoid sites that only offer cryptocurrency without any fiat alternative, as this can complicate withdrawals and limit your protection. Also steer clear of casinos that charge excessive fees for withdrawals or impose unrealistic turnover requirements before you can cash out.

Another red flag is a lack of Australian customer support. If you can’t reach a live agent during local business hours, resolving payment issues becomes a headache. Remember, a trustworthy aussie online casino offering secure payments will always provide clear, written terms regarding deposit and withdrawal policies.

Recommended practices for safe online gambling in Australia

To help you stay protected, here are key recommendations for managing your payments at any online casino.

• Use PayID or Osko for instant, no‑fee deposits and withdrawals
• Always enable two‑factor authentication on your casino account
• Set a monthly deposit limit before you start playing
• Withdraw winnings to the same method you used to deposit
• Avoid sharing your banking details over unsecured Wi‑Fi or public networks
• Check the casino’s withdrawal policy for minimum and maximum amounts
• Keep a record of all transaction receipts and confirmation emails

How local regulations shape payment security

Australia’s Interactive Gambling Act 2001 (IGA) sets the legal framework, but state‑based regulators also play a role. For example, the Northern Territory Racing Commission licenses many offshore operators, while the NSW Independent Liquor & Gaming Authority oversees local promotional activities. These bodies require operators to adhere to anti‑money laundering (AML) protocols, which directly impact how payments are processed.

Players in Victoria and Queensland benefit from the country’s real‑time payments system, the New Payments Platform (NPP), which powers PayID and Osko. This infrastructure means that funds can move between banks in seconds, giving Australian players a distinct advantage over players in many other markets. An aussie online casino offering secure payments will leverage this network to provide near‑instant transactions.

The future of secure payments in Australian online casinos

As technology evolves, so do payment options. Biometric authentication, such as fingerprint or facial recognition, is becoming more common for mobile casino apps. We are also seeing the emergence of open banking, where players can authorise payments directly from their bank without sharing card details. This will further reduce the risk of fraud and make the entire experience smoother. Sailing

For the Australian market, the adoption of stablecoins and regulated digital currencies could offer the speed of crypto with the stability of fiat. However, the core requirement remains unchanged: every transaction must be safe, traceable, and compliant with local laws. The best platforms will continue to invest in robust security infrastructure while keeping the user experience simple.

Take control of your gaming experience today

Choosing the right online casino is about more than fast payouts and generous bonuses – it’s about trusting that your money is in safe hands. By prioritising payment security, you protect yourself from scams, delays, and unnecessary stress. The next time you log in to play, check that your chosen site uses industry‑standard encryption, offers local payment methods, and has a clear track record of fair play.

Start your journey with a platform that puts security first. Explore the recommended sites and see for yourself how a dedicated aussie online casino offering secure payments can transform your online gaming into a worry‑free experience. view details

If you’re like me, your reactions this coming Wednesday’s “Day without a Woman”—the latest radical feminist protest on behalf of “the human rights of women and all gender-oppressed people”—may include one or all of the following:

• Roll your eyes and throw up your hands in disgust.
• Hurl something at the television as you watch yet one more biased news report claiming that all American females staunchly agree with the angry women involved in the so-called “Day without a Woman”.
• Or, last but not least, simply pull the covers over your heads and go back to bed hoping that when you wake up Thursday morning the world will be somewhat back to normal, if that’s even remotely possible.

The main focus of event is to encourage women to walk off their jobs for a variety of reasons, including the promotion of leftist ideals and the continued protest of the election results. Since 1909, according to the United Nations website, March 8^th has been set aside as International Women’s Day; it is meant to mark the contributions of women to society around the globe and “to affirm the principle of equality between women and men.” But apparently, according to the same group that brought us the ranting and raving of the likes of Whoopi, Madonna, and Ashley Judd on January 21^st, this is a day about “rights” including “open access to safe, legal, affordable abortion and birth control for all people” and “our obligation to uplift, expand and protect the rights of our gay, lesbian, bi, queer, trans or gender non-conforming brothers, sisters and siblings. We must have the power to control our bodies and be free from gender norms, expectations and stereotypes.”

In other words, it’s another way to promote radical feminist causes, which always include abortion-on-demand and birth control at the top of that “rights” list.

So it is certainly understandable to have an exasperated or even angry response to what should be called “Day without Politically-Correct Women”. But there are several better ways to not only respond to the latest extreme lefty shenanigans.  The fact is, there have been some concrete, positive efforts by many real, positive women who believe that their authentic feminine identity is not wrapped up or directly tied to abortion, birth control, “gender issues”, or hatred for particular political leaders.

They are women who don’t want to take their concerns out on their employers or their children by abandoning their responsibilities for a day.  They are women who believe in the sanctity of life from conception until natural death.  They are women who believe in the dignity of all people and respect the variety of roles women serve in both the home and the world.

Here are two very constructive and dignified ways to speak up this week about true feminism and womanhood:

Women Speak for Themselves Gatherings: This wonderful movement is the brainchild of law professor and Vatican consultant Helen Alvare. The organization was established a few years ago as a response to the Health and Human Services mandate imposed on religious institutions and Christian business owners under the Obama administration—a mandate that many of these entities are still fighting in the courts.  The small group WSFT gatherings are designed to bring together women in a comfortable and non-threatening home setting to spread the truth about what Christ and his Church really teach and say about issues such as abortion, contraception, and marriage.  The idea is to speak the truth in love; it is based on the knowledge that many people don’t really know what the Church teaches, having often formed their opinions and reactions through media reports and secular accounts. WSFT even provides topics, questions, and recipes.  So, while others are  grabbing their protest signs and taking to the streets in defiance, grab some friends and a bottle of vino and engage in fruitful discussions.

Lady Day: “Pure Goodness at Work!”: Catholic blogger Colette Zimmermann came up with the idea of using the day to honor the Blessed Mother as well as to counter the upcoming feminist strike.  In a press release she raises some great questions that too many who are drinking the March 8^th Madness Kool-Aid are choosing to ignore:

“But how many women can really skip work?  What about mothers?  What about nurses or any woman who works in society to help others?  We can’t skip work!  And furthermore, we don’t want to. Lady Day is a positive response, a day for us to celebrate God’s plan for women as pure and good.”

Suggestions for “Lady Day” include dressing up fashionably but modestly and heading out the door for tea with friends and then sharing thoughts and pictures of your tea time experience on Facebook and Twitter.

If you have another idea on how to productively spend National Woman’s Day, pass it on.  Perhaps you’re going to take your Mom out to lunch or visit women in a nursing home.  Maybe it’s a day to volunteer at the local pregnancy resource center or to pray outside a local abortion facility.  Speaking of abortion facilities, I wonder how many women will be walking off those jobs on Wednesday?

Whatever you do to counter the very destructive messages being promoted by radical feminists this week, remember St. Peter’s exhortation defend your faith in Christ with “gentleness and reverence” (1 Pet 3:15), and St. Francis de Sales’ reminder that we catch a lot more flies with honey than vinegar—or, as the case might be, with wine, cheese, and a good cup of hot tea.

Update (March 7, 2017): Some ways you can participate in celebrating the true dignity of all women:

• Use hashtag #RealWomenDontQuit on Wed. March 8th on Twitter and on other social media outlets.
• Send Teresa Tomeo peaceful, dignified ways to promote women by commenting on her blog or Facebook page.
• Tag Teresa Tomeo or direct message her your ideas on Facebook or Twitter.
• Forward this Email to your friends and family.
• Retweet #RealWomenDontQuit Tweets on Twitter.
• Post & Share your thoughts about #RealWomenDontQuit on Facebook.
• Pin the #RealWomenDontQuit image above on Pinterest and include the hashtag.
• Post the #RealWomenDontQuit image above on Instagram including the hashtag.

Reprinted with permission from The Catholic World Report.

“We need to be remembered for our passion and purpose, not our pink pussycat hats.”~Petula Dvorak

In a heart-breaking negation of the core concept of January 21’s Women’s March in D.C., Jayna Zweiman and Krista Suh have launched a parallel project dubbed the “Pussyhat Project.” Zweiman and Suh aim to create “a powerful visual statement” at the Women’s March on Washington, D.C – a sea of pink “pussies” demanding “fair treatment” and “honoring the truth.” Their environmental visual seeks to eliminate the differences between the many diverse attendees and create a “community” of women all wearing matching, handcrafted “pussy” hats.

No doubt well-intentioned by the organizers and knitters, this project harms the March, as well as feminism, women and girls, and  victims of sexual abuse and feminism,.

“Pussyhats” compromise the mission and purpose of the March. The purpose of the January 21 March is to feature “diversity” and to “reflect our multiple and intersecting identities.” From its inception, the March’s design and leadership have sought to promote a wide variety of identity groups, “joined in diversity,” while equating “women’s rights” with all “human rights,” including the most marginalized in society. Empathy and love, often associated with the feminine, motivate the peaceful, nonviolence of the event, an event meant to be an obvious coalition of “diverse communities.”

Zweiman and Suh have organized a vast effort to mask this very diversity and create for every woman attending a bright pink “pussy” cap. This spectacle threatens to obscure the crowd’s diversity and upend the purpose of the March.

Worse, the “sameness” they seek derives from a vile, derogatory reference to women’s sexual organs. Creating a sea of “pussies” will dramatically change the impact of this event, giving commentators and the media an easy excuse to ignore the serious, often complex, issues motivating women to protest. Already, news outlets – like USA Today – seem sadly captivated with “pussyhats” rather than issues at the heart of the March.  Challenging women not attending the event to craft and donate thousands of these caps eclipses the opportunity to engage women everywhere in the issues targeted by each protester.

 “Pussy” hurts women. Did Zweiman and Suh consider how hurtful and bullying the term “pussy” is for multitudes of girls and women? Fresh off a widely broadcast, triggering, derogatory use of the term by the President-elect, many women sincerely fear the new administration. They genuinely worry that feminism’s gains face reversal, along with a reassertion of a primarily sexual role for females, one based upon a uniform, male-driven scale of beauty.

In the aftermath of this controversy, some women have reportedly suffered hate crimes, taunted by catcalls and intimidation with the word “pussy” and related epithets. One college took action and called a post-election posting “with the message ‘Suck it up, pussies!'” a “targeted act of intimidation and cowardice.” This threat to the worth and dignity of each individual female concerns all women collectively.

Rather than soundly rejecting this derogatory hate term of harassment and objectification – and affirm women’s worth as a gender critical to the well being of society – Zweiman and Suh join the male, deprecatory voice to the March. They specifically acknowledge that “pussy” is “a derogatory term for female genitalia” but rationalize its use as a “term of empowerment.” How can slanderous objectification and stereotyping of women ever “empower” them to oppose their oppression and stand firm for their dignity and worth?

Now as before, women must refuse to be meek and guileful, for truth cannot be served by dissimulation. Women who fancy that they manipulate the world by pussy power and gentle cajolery are fools. It is slavery to have to adopt such tactics. ~Germaine Greer

The organizers’ claim that use of this vile word “empowers” women denies and invalidates the experience of women victimized by male verbal and sexual abuse. Yet the organizers and knitters are creating a social pressure and expectation for full inclusion in this community of women that everyone should don a “pussyhat.”  The very women who have compelling personal reasons to participate in this March – women sexually abused by men – might reasonably stay home, rather than deal with a long, triggering day of “pussyhats” and “pussy power.”

“Pussyhats” normalize sexualizing females. If the March draws the hundreds of thousands of women it envisions, media coverage will be abundant. Saturday evening news and Sunday talk shows will echo with debates about the sexualizing, pink hats and with open, uncensured use of the offensive “pussy” and “pussies.” Inevitably, there will be quips and snickering and offensive innuendo.

By Monday morning, every girl in the English-speaking world will know the reference and “pussy” will be a normal way of referring to a female whether in our elementary schools, colleges or workplaces. The “pussyhat” movement will have destroyed decades of work by courageous women – including victims of verbal abuse – by normalizing the derogatory term and purposefully injecting it into mainstream media as an appropriate reference to the female.

Imagine the harm Monday morning, as women across the country return to their workplaces and male colleagues – you know who they are – chide, “So, where’s your pussy hat?” or “Did your pussyhat keep your head warm?’   or “Did you have your head up your pussyhat?” How can an employer, teacher or manager address such nasty, derisive, sexual innuendo when women themselves normalized the word?

Even as I write, the subtle process of normalizing is apparent. The organizers fail to denote the pejorative nature of the word, typically reflected by a refusal to reprint the word in it’s entirety, e.g. “‘Suck it up p***ies!’ sticky note mocking anti-Trump students being investigated — as a hate crime.” Practically, to discuss the project, commentators, like myself, are forced to use the word as simply another noun.

“Pussyhats” trivialize crucial women’s issues. Finally, it must be observed that the “Pussyhat Project” smacks of affluence and privilege, myopically claiming knitting and crocheting as “traditionally women’s crafts.” While these crafts may well be fashionable in the organizers demographic bracket, only 1/3 of women even know how to knit or crochet. More, the average working woman, juggling job demands, family needs and life’s everyday stresses, is far more concerned with issues impacting daily life, such as childcare, medical coverage and job availability. The image of women leisurely sitting in supportive female circles whilst  knitting and crocheting through an evening is pure fiction for most women today.

This image is also frankly frivolous compared to the dire, pressing social issues with which girls and women desperately need help and support. Consider the children and women in the District of Columbia who, while the “pussyhat” marchers demand “fair treatment”, are trapped in sexual slavery.

Right here in the nation’s capital, our most vulnerable residents — children — are subjected to sex slavery. Their stories don’t make the evening news or even warrant blurbs in your morning paper. But human trafficking is, and has been, a shadowy and seamy part of D.C. life.

Sexual assault remains rampant in the United States, with 1 in 5 women saying they had been a victim, according to a 2011 survey. “Pussy” for these women and children, sexually enslaved and sexually damaged, is not “clever wordplay,” as Zweiman and Suh callously assert in their mission statement. “Pussy” is an intimate, private part of their bodies, which has been violated, commercialized, abused and wounded.

Women largely voted for Hillary Clinton out of concern for their rights as women. While 42% of women did vote for Donald Trump (including myself), their vote by no means signals satisfaction with issues of concern to women. Whether, like me, you are appalled by the killing of unborn girls and sexual trafficking of children or by the objectification of women as sex slaves or commercial wombs for hire, or whether you have other issues of concern such as pornography, unequal pay, access to education, the March is an opportunity to express both our concerns and our serious commitment to activism. As columnist Dvorak so eloquently said, “We can’t make a difference with goofy hats, cheeky signs and silly songs. This is our chance to stand up, to remind the world how powerful we are and demand to be heard. . . . We need to be remembered for our passion and purpose, not our pink pussycat hats.”

I urge Zweiman and Suh to scale back this ill-conceived project and discourage protestors from wearing “pussyhats.” I urge groups of women marching together to say “no” to this project and march as the serious-minded, worthy individuals they are. Let women’s concerns and solutions issue forth from this March, not over-shadowed by a pink, sexualizing, stereotyping scheme that commands press coverage.

My name is Bernadette Cudzilo, I am a Roman Catholic, wife, mother and grandmother. I work for a non-for profit healthcare accrediting company.

On November 8^th this year I will cast my vote for Donald Trump.

Trump was not my first choice in the Republican primary, but he was the majority’s choice. I feel we should support the democratic process and he was chosen. Yes, I am disappointed in the leadership of the Republican Party. I feel this election year will change it forever! People are not satisfied with what is happening in America; what is happening to our freedoms.

My decision to vote for Trump was influenced by several factors, including Donald Trump’s stand on pro-life. Remember that it was Bill Clinton who allowed partial birth abortion. Obama, an Illinois senator, supported this legislation. If Hillary Clinton is elected, this will only perpetrate the evil of abortion. Both Clintons were involved in supporting partial birth abortion: how can you be more against pro-life than aborting a baby at 8 months? This is the most horrific attack against innocence! I can only say that you must choose Trump if you are pro-life.

Also, Trump is correct about what makes a country. First, you have to have borders and, second, you must protect these borders. Like most Americans, my family is here because our grandparents left their homeland to come here for a better life; but they came here legally. What is going on in Europe confirms that when you have open borders, you don’t know who is coming and why they are coming.

I know that Trump’s temperament and language can be offensive, but he is not a polished politician. We must look beyond the image which is painted by the media and look at the essence of the individual. None of us are sinless and many would fail if we were put under such scrutiny by those who are against us.

Hillary Clinton is not a defender of woman. Today, she says every woman has a right to be believed when she has been sexually assaulted, but when Bill Clinton was assaulting women, she called them trailer trash and stood by her man. Why weren’t these woman allowed to be believed? I read the book, Crises of Character, written by a secret service agent. She has two faces and never really shows her true self.

Trump and Clinton are very different. Hillary Clinton, prochoice … Donald Trump, pro-life … Clinton, open borders …Donald Trump, controlled borders … Clinton, pay-to-play big government … Donald Trump, smaller federal government … Clinton, government economic stimulation …Donald Trump, business to grow the economy … Clinton, enrichment by selling favors … Trump, wealth through growing a business …Clinton, 100,000 Syrian Muslim refugees into the U.S.A. … Trump, concern for the 3% Syrian Christians who are being martyred.

There is only one choice for me, Donald Trump.

If you haven’t made a decision as to who you are going to vote for, please, consider voting for Trump because he will protect your freedoms.

In our continuing series “Women Vote,” we interviewed Marjorie Dannenfelser. Dannenfelser is the president of Susan B. Anthony List, a national pro-life political organization. ~ Editor

Q. Have you decided for whom you are going to vote on November 8?

 Yes, I will be voting for Donald Trump.

Q. Was this a difficult decision for you?

When the race came down to two, there was no question of whom I would support. Donald Trump is a convert to the pro-life issue, as he has explained. Converts do not always use the same words as longtime activists, but they do speak with passion and conviction when faced with the reality of the horror of abortion.

Q. What factors most influenced your choice?

In this election we’re not voting for the most virtuous candidate, or the one with perfect character. As with every election, policy commitments are what will chart the course for the future. Each candidate’s approach to the Supreme Court will, far and away, have the most important implications for our nation’s future. That’s why policy is the main factor to consider when choosing whom to support.

Q. Which policy most concerns you, specifically?

Throughout the campaign, Donald Trump’s pro-life commitments have gotten increasingly stronger. He’s pledged to defund America’s #1 abortion chain Planned Parenthood, advance and sign into law the Pain-Capable bill, and protect the Hyde Amendment. Most importantly, he’s pledged to appoint pro-life Justices to the Supreme Court.

Hillary Clinton, on the other hand, has promised the abortion industry she will be their advocate. She has doubled down on her support for abortion on-demand, up until the moment of birth, paid for by taxpayers. There is not a single unborn child she would protect from abortion.

Q. Many women have been offended by comments made by the candidate Trump about women, Mexicans and immigrants, What do you think of his temperament and language?

I cannot and will not defend many of the things Donald Trump has said on the campaign trail. His comments about women were horrifying and triggering for women and girls who have been victims of sexual assault and harassment. Similarly horrifying is Hillary Clinton’s treatment of the women who came in and out of her husband’s life, whom she sought to blame, shame, and ruin.

Q. Many women have been offended by behaviors of the candidate Clinton toward her husband’s lovers, including Paula Jones, Monica Lewinsky and others and towards people who have and do work for her, such as Secret Service agents? What do you think of her temperament and language?

Hillary Clinton has ignored, belittled, and defamed the women injured by her husband. She even defended a child rapist, and was caught on tape laughing at how she had helped him escape punishment. Her treatment of women is indefensible. In the face of two candidates like this, policy must be the deciding factor in considering whom to vote for.

Q. Many women are concerned with pro-life issues, especially recognizing the humanity and rights of the fetus. Which candidate do you find closest to your thinking on this issue. Why?

Donald Trump is, without question, the only pro-life candidate. He has pledged to defund the nation’s largest abortion business, Planned Parenthood, appoint pro-life Justices to the Supreme Court, advance and sign into law the Pain-Capable bill to end late-term abortion after five months, and to protect the Hyde Amendment which bars taxpayer funds from being used for elective abortion. Hillary Clinton is the abortion industry’s candidate. Planned Parenthood is spending $30 million to help elect her. In return, she’s pledged to always “have their back,” and to open wide the gates of taxpayer funding of abortion by repealing the longstanding Hyde Amendment and expanding abortion on-demand without limits.

Q. Are there other differences between Trump and Clinton which you view as fundamentally opposed?

Hillary Clinton has reduced to almost nothing the centrality of faith in day to day life. She has said that deep seated religious beliefs and cultural codes need to be changed.

Q. Is there anything else you’d like to say to women who are discerning how to vote on November 8?

I am hopeful that our first female president will embody values that we can be proud of as Americans and as people of faith. Being involved in politics at both the national and state levels, I am confident that the right woman will come along soon. There are many active, passionate women serving today in elected position – women who value the dignity and rights of the unborn. I look forward to supporting a pro-life female president in future elections. 

Susan B. Anthony List and its connected super PAC, Women Speak Out so far have spent more than $18 million in the 2016 election cycle, knocking on more than one million doors in battleground states to defeat Hillary Clinton and maintain a pro-life Senate. SBA List pursues policies and elects candidates who will reduce and ultimately end abortion.

My name is Vicki Evans and I am happy to be sharing with you how I discerned my vote for the Presidential election next week. I’m a CPA and have run a small business for decades. I’m also a pro-life activist with an advanced degree in bioethics.

I have watched our country’s ethically treacherous path accelerate under the Obama Administration.  I have dreaded Hillary Clinton’s rise as first female presidential nominee in this already ethically perilous environment. Her extremism on issues like abortion puts her completely out of touch with women on the ground. In her view of feminism, “reproductive rights” define women.

We are about so much more.

Labeling Hillary a hypocrite would be an understatement. She “plays the woman card” when it’s useful. Her every decision and stance is politically calculated. When it comes to having actual empathy for women, she does not. Her viciousness towards Bill’s paramours remains notorious. Today, that viciousness extends to all women, women like me, who do not share her extreme pro-abortion convictions. Like all other pro-life women, I fall into her “basket of deplorables.”

Similarly, in the pursuit of her personal goals, Hillary has blithely risked national security and ignored the rule of law. The Clinton Foundation has been involved for years in million-dollar “pay-to-play” transactions with foreign countries, many of which have no regard for human rights. Her email scandal appears far from over.

Compared to Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump is fresh air. We need a populist candidate to stop the tide of political elites dictating our moral beliefs. I am confident that Donald Trump will roll back the extreme social policies of the Obama Administration – which would become even more radical under a Clinton Administration.

I know many are offended by Mr. Trump’s comments. However, I am offended by the political correctness that is required in today’s society. As an employer, I’m offended that ObamaCare requires employers, including religious ones, to facilitate no-cost contraception to their employees. I’m offended that our religious freedoms are fast becoming a thing of the past and that conscientious objection is now called discrimination. I’m offended that government regulations have reached into our schools to dictate bathroom use and that the federal government is intent on obliterating states’ rights by forbidding any curtailment of funding for Planned Parenthood, effectively ignoring its trade in fetal body parts. I’m offended that Hillary Clinton has now set her sights on forcing taxpayers to finance unlimited abortions both here and abroad.

Deciding to vote for Donald Trump and Mike Pence was not a difficult decision – they propose much that I believe in and offer hope for a nation in moral decline.

No candidate is memory has released a list of specific pro-life judges he would appoint to the Supreme Court. Donald Trump released two such lists. It’s safe to say that, beyond appointments to the Supreme Court, a President Trump would stop packing the circuit courts and courts of appeals with liberal judges intent on creating social policy.

No other candidate has ever promised to repeal the Johnson Amendment and return First Amendment rights to our pastors, allowing churches to more fully participate in the public square.

I see Trump as being honest and probably too forthright for his own good as a candidate. I live in the real world and I have heard much worse than Trump’s crude remarks – such as being called a bigot to my face for believing in marriage between a man and a women.

Please get out and vote, and vote for Donald Trump! Don’t let our children grow up in a world without ethics and our basic freedoms.

This post begins a series profiling how individual women voters discern their choice on the 2016 Presidential ticket. Please feel free to comment and question and join in the discussion. (Comments are monitored so they do not appear immediately. Please see the Policy on Comments.) ~Editor

Greetings All. My name is Cathleen Gillies. I am a Catholic wife, mother, bond salesman and pro-life advocate.

On the 2016 Presidential ticket, I have decided to vote for Donald Trump and Mike Pence. I’d like to share the reasons for my decision with the readers of NewFeminism.co.

This decision was not particularly difficult for me personally. While I recognize that he has come across as rude and brash from the beginning, I felt that Donald Trump was laying the truth on our nation. I feel that he is standing up for all the people the ruling class holds in contempt: people of faith, the working class people and the people who live in the heartland of our nation.  Theses people, who include me, have been taken for granted and ignored by both parties.

I love that Trump is not afraid to call Christmas, Christmas.

As a Catholic and a pro-lifer, I am very concerned about religious liberty and life issues.  Although I’m not 100% certain what Trump is going to do, I definitely know what Hillary Clinton’s plans to do and this SCARES ME.

I’ve been impressed by Trump’s small, human gestures Trump sent a personal note to my husband’s cousin after learning that his mother and our cousin’s mother were born in the same hospital. This is not the blustering bigot the media tries to present.

I am convinced that the media takes Trump’s word and language out of context. To me, he comes across as teaching people to “please grow up and let’s talk real.” I appreciate this.

I also personally met and greeted Hillary Clinton who left me feeling cold.

Clinton represents to me the biggest hypocrite – she lies and attempts to cover up who she is, where as with Trump what you see is what you get.  He’s refreshing.

Pro-life issues remain a primary concern of mine. We know that Trump has been a pro-life crusader in this election and we know that Clinton knows that an unborn child is a human being but says these children have no rights at all.  From Clinton’s track record we know she pushes pro-abortion agenda. Donald Trump he’s provided a list of potential Supreme Court nominees who are all pro life.

He is not anti-immigrant but he will stand up to follow the laws that protect our nation from people who want to break the laws and or attack us.  Our current administration is failing to do this.

For all of his vanity and showman ship – I get the feeling that he is a patriot at heart and cares about his country.  I can’t say this about Hillary Clinton and her dealings with selling the government to people who paid her Clinton Foundation money. Foreign countries that funded the foundation now have direct access to the US government.  This angers and scares me – because these countries don’t share my values especially since the countries hate women and children.

I don’t consider Hillary Clinton trustworthy. I’ll take my chance with Donald Trump.

I ask all my fellow sisters in Christ to Pray. Pray. Pray.  For Catholic women, please join me in confession, Mass and Rosary.

Recently I was asked to comment, as a New Feminist, on my friend Marjorie Campbell’s post “Trump the Guy”. As someone who has strong opinions on the type of leader I feel America needs right now, I agreed to read and see how one of my colleagues in the New Feminist movement might feel about the leader of the GOP hunt for the party nomination. As I read her post I’ll admit I was honestly surprised to see Campbell attempt to personalize a man who she herself outs in her first few paragraphs as someone who is capable of making obscene and degrading comments about women. How can someone who openly admits that a candidate has publicly rated women based solely on their appearance find enough redeeming qualities to give what appears to be support for them as a candidate? Well, honestly, I don’t think she was able to do that.

When I began reading Campbell’s post, I expected it to evolve into a strong rallying cry for New Feminists to unite and teach our daughters to expect more from their male counterparts. I expected an honest assessment of why this man might appear appealing initially to some women, but then a firm reminder that we as complentarianists expect a level of respect and equal dignity to be given to the opposite sex at all times.

Campbell took a strange and unexpected turn however when she calls attention to the fact that Trump is enjoying a lot of support from women, particularly women with little education. To me it is would go without much investigation that his female supporters would be poorly educated, as women with higher levels of learning tend to have higher self-confidence and higher expectations of men.  In a Gallup poll released in December, Trump had the lowest net favorable rating out of all the candidates among college-educated Republican women. In that same poll it was summed up that “Trump is not that popular in general among Republicans, but has a particular image problem among women and those with college and postgraduate degrees. Looking at this from a different angle, Trump clearly has his greatest appeal to Republican men — and, in particular, to Republican men without a college degree.” It would seem that the poorly educated women are likely voting alongside their poorly educated men.

Instead of acknowledging the limitations that can come along with lack of education, Campbell focuses on this demographic of uneducated women and uses them as representative of the majority of women. She states that the “small contingent of activist women” who are offended by the type of “guy talk” that is typical of Trump have “always been a minority, [however.]… Many of these women don’t like men. They don’t live with men; much less love a man as a primary component of their lives.” I couldn’t disagree more strongly with this as my own experience, and the experiences of most women I spoke with about this confirmed that we happily married heterosexual women expect a far higher level of behavior from our men, and that we are deeply offended by Trump’s comments. And I certainly do not think we are the minority contingent Campbell is referring to.

Campbell posits that the majority of women are not offended by what Donald Trump is saying and then goes on to say the reason is because of cultural white washing on gender differentiation. “For many of us men-loving females, especially those of us who live with working class and alpha males, Trump’s language is more than familiar; it is even intimate. We understand it, because we understand guy talk. It does not scare us.”

And that right there scares the hell outta me! If the majority of American women are OK with being rated on their looks, with being disrespected as wives, as employees, and as professionals then I am afraid that the New Feminist movement has a lot more work to do than I initially realized. This has nothing to do with men attempting to assert masculinity in a culture that has moved toward gender neutral status (that is another topic completely that I would be happy to continue discussing), but it does have everything to do with a narcissistic man playing on the insecurities in the average person for his own gain.

Campbell attempts to humanize Donald Trump by using a “guys will be guys” sort of approach and says that Americans are not turned off by his often crass comments because we are familiar with the type of man that Trump is. She says that many of our fathers, brothers, and husbands act just like him in the privacy of their homes and she puts forward that most Americans are not offended by this sort of man because we know them to be good natured underneath their obviously crusty exteriors. So because the average man has not lived up to the calling of authentic masculinity, we are supposed to embrace a man that epitomizes all the familiar bad qualities of the broken men we love?

Donald Trump is not merely just a guy who likes to kick back with his friends and embrace his “masculinity”. He doesn’t just like to have a beer and talk a little trashy with his buddies and rate a pretty girl that happens to walk by on Guys Night (which I would argue has nothing to do with authentic masculinity). No, his misogyny is a much higher level of degradation of women. And if we can’t see the difference between his actions and the smutty words of the men in our own lives, then we have drunk the Kool-Aide called Self-Denial, America.

What was not mentioned in “Trump the Guy” is that Trump’s misogynistic tendencies go much further than his foul mouth and personal life. Along with his dirty comments on Howard Stern and his divorces due to self admitted extramarital affairs, Trump actually has several business ventures that speak to his willingness to objectify women and profit off them. In August of 2013, Trump’s Taj Mahal casino became the first casino in Atlantic City, N.J., to have an in-house strip club.  Until this past month, Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump had a 10-percent ownership stake in that same Atlantic City casino and hotel, which also hosted a convention dedicated to the production, sale and promotion of hardcore pornography. The eXXXotica Expo occurred at the Trump Taj Mahal Casino & Resort in both April 2014 and April 2013.

It doesn’t take a genius to see the connections between the underworld of strip clubs, sex trafficking, pornography, and prostitution. It is a world that Trump is comfortable in and knows how to navigate. In March 1990 he even posed for the cover of Playboy magazine—next to a model wearing only his tuxedo jacket. Bottom line: Donald Trump has profited directly from the exploitation of women. I don’t think many of us would think of our hardworking fathers, brothers, and husbands when we think about a billionaire profiting off the sale of women’s bodies through the sex industry. But he does. Donald Trump is nothing like the hardworking blue-collar men that many of us are acquainted with, and to think otherwise is to fall victim to the fabulous marketing his campaign managers have used to endear him to frustrated voters.

Perhaps some voters are drawn to his candid, crass talk because they are tired of the political correctness that is required of presidential candidates. And maybe they do find some sanity in his noting differences between the sexes. I can understand how the effects of Feminism’s obsession with gender neutrality has gotten under their skin and they might just appreciate someone calling a woman beautiful, but what Trump is doing is NOT an effective response to the gender white washing that is currently in vogue. He is not calling women beautiful as his equal counter-part, but rather as a sign of his power.

What Campbell fails to call forward is that all gender differentiation should be done with respect for the beautiful strengths of the opposite sex. What Trump does repeatedly in his public comments, business decisions, and personal life is reduce the beauty of women’s contributions to the world down to their physical appearance. When he speaks of a woman of class like Princess Diana, he has to degrade her memory by saying she was “hot” and that he “could have slept with her”. A man with any sense of the equal worth of woman to him could not say such a callous stupid thing when looking at the accomplishments of the late Princess of Whales.

And so I disagree with my colleague. I do not know or recognize any of the men in my life when I see Donald Trump. He is not endearing, or clever, or innocently awkward. He is a dangerous misogynist that knows how to raise up a frustrated electorate. He is a business man who looks out for Number 1. He uses and exploits people for profit. He is NOT the model for the type of man who respects women or truly cares about our rights as mothers, as daughters, as sisters, as wives. A vote for Donald Trump is a backwards vote for the progress of New Feminists everywhere.